Welcome to London Civic Watch

"Ever wonder if City Council is as contentious and chaotic as it is sometimes portrayed? Here you can get a progressive perspective on some of the issues from someone who spent four years in the trenches. Totally unbiased, though! Feel free to comment but keep it respectful, just like they do at council."

Monday, January 23, 2012

Time to say goodbye

On Sunday, I visited Storybook Gardens. It has been four years since I was last there, on the coldest day of the year. At that time, I was checking things out in light of the new business plan that had been put forward by staff.

Harbour seal photo courtesy of the city of London
Storybook Gardens had been losing money ever since the renovations of 2003 which removed many of the nursery rhyme themes. The business plan was to be a catalyst for public discussion and participation. Surveys were undertaken and in April 2008, a public participation meeting was held before Community and Protective Services Committee. A large number of delegations appeared to make submissions, both oral and written.

Many of the submissions dealt with the zoo operations of the park. This should have come as no surprise. The creation of the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee at city hall meant that those concerned about animal welfare had a forum for learning and sharing information. The mandate of that committee included making recommendations about the use of animals in entertainment. And it did.

Additionally, Londoners had recently become concerned about roadside zoos since our city had just received an international black eye in having within its city limits the Likkety-Split Zoo, notorious for its inadequate facilities, especially for Tyson, the kangaroo. That zoo was eventually shut down leaving Storybook Gardens as our only other zoo.

Although licensed by the province, the zoo at Storybook Gardens is the only municipally operated zoo that has not been accredited by the Canadian Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Standards for zoos have been increasing; for the city to meet these standards in order to be accredited would cost millions of dollars, dollars which could not be reclaimed by box office sales. Although many visitors have a sentimental attachment to some of the animals, they are not a big attraction for children, holding their attention only briefly.

It is clear from the comments from the public at the April 2008 public participation meeting that the condition of the captive animals, both indigenous and exotic, were of foremost concern. Delegation after delegation spoke of the inadequate conditions, the small cages, the inability of the inmates to behave naturally due to the limitations of their imposed habitat. Many suggested that, failing major improvements and enlargements of the existing enclosures, the zoo be converted into an animal sanctuary or rehabilitation centre or, failing that, to have the animals relocated to more suitable surrounding.

Following the public participation meeting, the city invited the public to participate on a task force to make recommendations on the business plan.  A number of work groups were established as part of this task force dealing with environmental initiatives, interactive play, literacy, storybook themes, and animal care. About 30 people responded to the invitation and participated, giving up their spare time to attend at four meetings over the summer. The Animal Care working group recommended that the wild animal portion of the zoo be phased out and improvements made for the remaining domestic animals. This, along with other recommendations, was submitted to council in time to be included in the 2009 budget.

The concern about the condition of the animals is clear from the recommendations made by staff. Nearly half of them dealt with this, including the following:
  • Take immediate and low cost steps to improve conditions for the animals at Storybook.
  • Bring no new animals to the park. Farm animals may well be seen as acceptable as they complement the petting zoo concept.
  • Any animals leaving Storybook must be transferred to an equal or better environment.
  • Members of the committee will continue to assist in the sourcing of alternative homes for specific animals.
This was the plan that was adopted by council in December 2008. It was recognized at the time that this would be a slow process. It is not easy finding appropriate accommodations for animals. Locations are few and transportation difficult and expensive.

But recently, some opportunities have presented themselves, thanks to the continuing efforts of Storybook Gardens staff and Friends of Captive Animals (FOCA) and its founder, Vicki Van Linden, who has been tireless in her efforts to improve the lives of animals in captivity. By working with   Zoocheck, a national animal protection charity established in 1984 to promote and protect the interests and well-being of wild animals,  they identified appropriate homes for the remaining wild animals at no cost to the city. Even the transportation costs, which can be formidable, are being covered by Zoocheck.

So where are they going?

According to the city press release,
  • The four harbour seals will be moved to The St. Louis Zoo in Missouri, which is currently constructing a new, $18 million state-of-the-art pool  
  • The pair of Lynx will be moved to PAWS Wildlife Sanctuary in California
  • The beavers and otter will be moved to Aspen Valley Wildlife Sanctuary near Rousseau ON
  • The birds of prey will be moved to Sandy Pines Wildlife Sanctuary near Nepean ON
It has been three years since council adopted the plan. Many of the current councillors wouldn’t be familiar with the history. Even for me, who had taken a great interest in the issue, a refresher course was in order.

That’s why I went back to the zoo on Sunday. I wanted to know what Londoners would be losing and what the animals would be gaining.

Storybook Gardens has been in my life since it opened in 1958. I routed for Slippery when he tried to make his great escape prior to the opening. Although thousands came out to greet him when he was finally captured and returned ten days or so later, I’m sure it was not a happy homecoming for him. There is little joy in swimming around in circles.

That’s what I saw on Sunday, the seals swimming in circles until feeding time when they entertained the skaters there with their antics in vying for fish. But the diversion was short-lived; soon the spectators returned to their skating and then their homes. The seals returned to swimming in circles.

"Last summer, our group did an observational study of the Harbour seals, with co-operation from management and staff,” says Van Linden. “We observed that the seals 'pattern swimming,' a repetitive behaviour that indicates stress. There were other problems directly related to the design of the pool. There is no way to fix these things without spending millions of dollars. So we are thrilled that these seals are going to move to a penthouse lifestyle in an $18 million dollar pool and habitat. We wish them well."

That thought was echoed by Cathy Casagrande, supervisor of guest services at Storybook. “We will miss the animals,” she acknowledged, but she recognized their lives would be significantly improved by being relocated. “We can only do so much, “she said.

It’s clear that the staff is much attached to the animals. The woman who was feeding the seals knew their sexes, their ages, their habits. She too will miss them.

When I reached the otter enclosure, the sole occupant immediately dove into the water and bobbed up and down in front of me. Whether he hoped to be fed or was just desperate for any diversion, I don’t know. But it must be lonely for a gregarious animal to live in solitary confinement. Life will be better in an animal sanctuary, for the otter and the beavers, too. I didn’t see the lynx.

I used to go to Storybook Gardens more frequently, chaperoning a grade 1 class and various nieces and nephews. I rarely stayed long at the animal enclosures; they just made me too sad.

But many Londoners will feel a sense of loss. It’s hard not to be sentimental over the components of what, in retrospect, is an idyllic childhood. They’ll be looking for an opportunity to say farewell. I’m sure that that too is part of the plan.

"We hope that kind Londoners will be generous in wishing these animals well. They are all going to facilities much better designed to meet their needs,” say Van Linden. “They deserve that, and we are thrilled that the animals are all taking a big step up in quality of life."


Barry Wells said...

Top ten features of Storybook as rated by children:
1. Seals
2. Spray pad
3. Pirate’s Island
4. Train
5. Farm animals
6. Carousel
7. Otters
8. Animal shows
9. Ferris wheel
IO. Storybook Mascots

Apparently London has the money to contemplate costly pie-in-the-sky projects such as an urban beach at the Forks but can't wrap its collective head around the idea of improving wildlife enclosures at Storybook Gardens.

Since City staff et al. have given up on London's ability to properly look after its popular wildlife friends, perhaps it's time for all of us to put on the vanishing cream in favour of more suitable locations.

Little wonder Slippery the Sea Lion made the move "to get out of town" back in 1958 and the Lombardo orchestra had to blow this pop stand back in 1924.

London is clearly the City of Opportunity. As in get out of town.

James E said...

I'm shocked, SHOCKED that you didn't stop to see the Lynx canadensis! Here I thought you were a friend of the felines.

Slippery said...

I see by the local bird cage carpeting that a couple of the Councillors disagree with the animals' relocation. Dale is for privatizing (surprise, surprise) and Bud wants to reopen the issue, so that he can maintain his customary stance - being on both sides of every issue.

Oliver Hobson said...

Alluding that the city's community engagement routines have somehow been a success is a bit much.

While the outcome looks like a positive one, allowing politicians to use it as justification for maintaining status-quo on issues of governance and community consultation...?

Still left in place is governance through whim with decisions made based on personal prejudice with outcomes designed to maximize personal political fortune at the expense of everything else.

Local cultures that now care more for animals than for people...is a bit topsy-turvy.

Politically it fits in the same category as banning shark fin soup...an easy appearance of victory and giving all involved a nice warm feeling.

Anonymous said...

I loved seeing the seals the most too, and I'm proud that Storybook Gardens and the City of London that I call home helped save them and I'm happy to hear that they are going to be moved from the isolation unit to an enviroment that's the next best thing to their natural habitate.

I'm disappointed Storybook Garden's isn't going to be a rehab center for wounded and injured wildlife, like the one in Pinafore Park in St. Thomas but maybe it's not too late for that. ... might make a good trout farm too.